FAO-ANIMALHEALTH-L Archives

Establishment of a PPR Global Research and Expertise Network (PPR-GREN)

FAO-AnimalHealth-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
fatih barut <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
fatih barut <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:35:57 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2503 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
Dear all,
I think letting PPR endemic is not an option. 
For WNV, BT and other arboviruses which uses midges and wild life to hide, it can be acceptable.
Because there is not easy way to control wild life and midges.
On the other hand it seems much more reasonable to eradicate PPR like we do RP.

Best wishes.


Fatih Barut
Veterinarian

 
---

 
With my Best Wishes
 
M.Fatih BARUT D.V.M PhD 
Virological Diagnosis Lab.
Etlik Central Veterinary Control and Research Institute 
Kecioren / ANKARA /TURKEY 06020


________________________________
 From: Paul Rossiter <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2014 9:16 PM
Subject: Another Good Question; this time from Drs Taylor and Kivaria.
 




Dear Colleagues,
 
Dr Bill Taylor, who is very well known to most of us,  made a striking challenge in his contribution. He suggested that unless we use vaccine sufficiently widely and thoroughly to stop transmission of the virus in its endemic heartlands (moderator's summary) then we are simply going to help virus perpetuation. Therefore,  "why waste public resources vaccinating?" The idea received support from Dr Kivaria who went even further to say that perhaps we should just live with the disease.  I wonder how many of us think the same?    
 
Would some of you like to comment on Dr Taylor's and Dr Kivaria's suggestions giving us feedback on how you see public finances being used to bring about serious "progressive control" or whether this disease could just be left to itself and to the the private sector.  
 
In a way the topic leads to the basic question of why do we want to eradicate PPR?  We all assume this has been answered but has it? Some reasons have been put forward in a few contributions to the conference but are they enough to convince policy and decision makers and those who hold the purse strings? 
 
With regards - moderator. 
________________________________
 
To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1 

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2