FAO-ANIMALHEALTH-L Archives

Establishment of a PPR Global Research and Expertise Network (PPR-GREN)

FAO-AnimalHealth-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
داراب عبدالهی <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
داراب عبدالهی <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:52:14 +0330
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Dear All:

I totally agree with Afzal. In Iran we mostly recommend to use pox vaccine with anthrax at same time in sheep or to vaccinated brucellosis and pox in same way. But it’s most important to focused on combined (multiple) vaccine.



Darab abdollahi DVM

Deputy Director of Bureau of

Animal Health and Disease Management

Iran Veterinary Organization (IVO)

 Vali  Asr Avenue, Seyd Jamaledin Asad Abadi Street

Tehran 6349,  Islamic Republic of Iran

________________________________________

From: Establishment of a PPR Global Research and Expertise Network (PPR-GREN) [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Afzal, MuhammadImam (FAOPK) [[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 5:16 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: From Dr M Akram supporting the multiple disease approach and making a case for enterotoxaemia control



Dear All,

Combining inactivated / killed vaccine with live vaccine will not be a good idea. We should try combining live vaccines of pox, brucellosis and PPR (as one dose or as three separate doses given at same time)  and test in experimental and field testing before using in the field.

Dr. M. Afzal



From: Paul Rossiter <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Reply-To: Paul Rossiter <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:12:57 +0500

To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Subject: From Dr M Akram supporting the multiple disease approach and making a case for enterotoxaemia control



Dear Paul and Colleagues,



I strongly support this idea of following multiple disease approach. I would like however to add Enterotoxaemia in the said list especially in Pakistan perspectives. Enterotoxaemia is one of the important diseases in the list of differential diagnosis with PPR and causing huge losses in Pakistan. There should be provision for the national veterinary authorities to prioritise as to what other disease(s) with PPR are to be packaged in their country/region however PPR-GREN network should identify the diseases that can be packaged with PPR based on existing research and or prospective research in the matter.



Akram



________________________________



To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2