FAO-ANIMALHEALTH-L Archives

Establishment of a PPR Global Research and Expertise Network (PPR-GREN)

FAO-AnimalHealth-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Honhold <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nick Honhold <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:27:09 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1283 bytes) , text/html (2164 bytes)
It was certainly a very major impact on small ruminant productivity in 
Bangladesh. Not at all a mild endemic disease at that time. It does 
indicative that even at lower mortality rates, vaccination is likely to 
pass the fairly limited but often used tool that is benefit cost ration 
analysis.

On 22/02/2014 15:55, Paul Rossiter wrote:
> About 10 years ago we did an impact analysis and a benefit cost ratio 
> for PPR vaccination in Bangladesh. That country is endemically 
> infected and it appeared that around 50% of kids died of PPR each 
> year. We estimated from the fairly rough economic analysis that PPR 
> vaccination would produce a benefit cost ratio of around 10.
>
> Nick
> This  very high mortality rate would be quite unsustainable for the 
> farmers without some form of intervention.  Not at all the image of 
> mild endemic disease.  - Moderator.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1
>


########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2