FAO-ANIMALHEALTH-L Archives

Establishment of a PPR Global Research and Expertise Network (PPR-GREN)

FAO-AnimalHealth-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mansoor Al Qadasi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mansoor Al Qadasi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:07:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Dear colleagues 
i gone through some messages mentioning vaccination coverage. the message of our colleague  Prof. Kock identified that outbreak with 80% vaccination  coverage according to the ministry census data. as we knew from the rinderpest lesson 80% vaccination coverage  is quote good. but the situation mentioned above with big outbreak in 2011 and then in 2013 despite the big coverage of vaccination. i think here we should think about number of factor can limit the efficacy of the vaccination process (supposing that vaccine is a good quality): 1) cold chain can be assessed ether storage or during the transportation to the field and also during the process of the vaccination  2) the operator that giving the vaccine in the field. if these two operations were followed well then we have to think about the vaccine efficiency. to monitor the    two operations mentioned   we have to implement sero=monitoring survey after each vaccination campaign.

thank you
Mansoor Alqadasi   

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2