FSNFORUM-L Archives

FSN Forum, a knowledge network on Food Security and Nutrition

FSNFORUM-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
FSN-Moderator <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
FSN-Moderator <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:31:32 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 kB) , text/html (36 kB) , image001.png (6 kB) , image002.png (6 kB) , image003.png (6 kB) , image004.jpg (52 kB)
[FAO]





[FSN Forum]





DISCUSSION No. 134   •   FSN Forum digest No. 1277





Using information technology in the agriculture of

APEC economies and beyond.



The potential of Wisdom Agriculture for poverty reduction and improved food security.



until 30 November 2016











[icon]How to participate



Send your contribution to

[log in to unmask]

<mailto:[log in to unmask]>or post it on the

FSN Forum website www.fao.org/fsnforum<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum>

[© FAO]





Dear Members,

Please find below the summaries of the latest contributions received to the ongoing online discussion "Using information technology in the agriculture of APEC economies and beyond<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>. The potential of Wisdom Agriculture for poverty reduction and improved food security<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>".

Participants are providing information on the current situation regarding ICT utilization in their specific countries and on examples of practical applications of ICTs in agriculture.

Furthermore, they are sharing their ideas regarding the benefits and challenges that are associated with this, thereby placing developments in information technology in a broader socio-economic context. We invite you to keep reflecting on these issues.

To read the introduction to this discussion and to post your contribution, please visit the discussion webpage in English<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>, Chinese<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/zh/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>, French<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/fr/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>, Russian<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/ru/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture> or Spanish.<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/es/activities/discussions/wisdom_agriculture>

We look forward to your input on this important topic!

Your FSN Forum team















CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED



[icon]Peter Steele, Independent consultant, Australia



Peter relates technological developments to broader societal processes. He highlights that the modern world has become increasingly divided between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’, and mentions that the minority has become richer at the expense of the masses. This leads in turn to the use of technologies to bridge gaps and improve lives, which brings with it significant socio-economic changes. Related to this, Peter shares the example of a project aiming to boost passion fruit production in Burundi, in which the use of mobile phones was recommended. However, unlike other countries of the East African Community, the use of mobile phones in Burundi has been limited due to inadequate infrastructure and high costs.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7628>







[icon]Raymond Erick Zvavanyange, Young Professionals for Agricultural Development, Zimbabwe



Raymond sees the benefits of using ICTs in agriculture,  but points out that the focus has rather been on the technologies themselves than on the ‘designers’ or people behind these technologies, and their motifs, aspirations and worldviews. He argues that one of the steps in expanding on the possibilities of ICTS concerns revisiting our capabilities to address the problems associated with utilizing ICTs.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7616>







[icon]Olayemi Samson Sennuga, Royal Agricultural University, Circencester, UK



Olayemi elaborates on his research, which focuses on how mobile phones could be better used to improve the adoption of Good Agricultural Practices and to increase the productivity of smallholders. In the context of his study, he trained Nigerian smallholders on 16 Good Agricultural Practices and on the effective use of mobile phones to improve the adoption of these Practices, unlock market prices and increase bargaining skills. Olayemi concludes that the role of ICTs coupled with adequate resources cannot be underestimated; the intervention has created rural prosperity and an increase in agricultural productivity and farmers’ incomes.

Read the contribution<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7627>







[icon]Gao Lois, CAAS, China



In his first contribution<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7625>, Gao elaborates on the challenges associated with agriculture sensor technology. He argues that currently, this technology is relatively expensive and not suitable for ordinary crops. In addition, the domestic sensor performance is not stable enough, and the exposure of equipment to natural environments entails high maintenance costs.

In his second contribution<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7626>, Gao stresses the need to promote the use of agricultural product traceability systems among farmers. In this regard, the government should provide technical and policy support and should for instance help farmers sell high quality products at a good price.







[icon]Fei Gao, China



According to Fei, Wisdom Agriculture may give China the chance to catch up with other countries in terms of the standard of production, processing and distribution of agricultural products. He argues that research on Wisdom Agriculture has been conducted, but questions to what extent the knowledge generated has been applied in practice.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7624>







[icon]Boris Karpunin, Russian Federation



Boris argues that in Russia, the use of robots in agriculture should be intensified and stresses that in his country, robotisation will not have the negative consequence of creating unemployment as population density is low. Deploying robots in the agricultural sector will for instance facilitate the more efficient use of ploughed lands, allow for the implementation of landscape-specific technologies, and significantly reduce food production costs. Boris defines the goal of a robotized agriculture as "production with the lowest possible cost and optimum yields with minimal impact on environment”.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7620>







[icon]Senkosi Kenneth, Forum for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa, Uganda



Senkosi recognizes the potential of ICTs in terms of improving the coordination of agricultural activities and for generating data, but points to the fact that in many African countries ICTs have not yet been fully embraced. Drones, for instance, can be very useful for the efficient gathering of data over expansive distances, but their usage has met resistance for security reasons. Hence, the challenge is to convince governments of the appropriateness of their use. In general, awareness of politicians on the role of ICTs in poverty reduction and improving food security is needed for adequate government support.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7614>







[icon]Chuang Gong, China



Chuan Gong introduces the ICTforAG projects, which have in particular behaviour change goals. For example, a goal may be to change farmers’ practices in order to improve soil quality.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7603>







[icon] Dhanya Praveen, Environment Protection Training and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India



Dhanya refers to the Bali Action Plan that was adopted in the context of COP 13, which has drawn  attention to the role of ICTs in climate change adaptation and mitigation. She points out that ICTs have been of great use to Indian smallholders, and mentions a number of initiatives that have been implemented in her country, such as the rice knowledge management portal and e-Choupal. In addition, digital inclusion of farmers and the issue of strategically using ICTs in farming systems have been part of the Climate-Smart Villages-project.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7602>







[icon] Jabar Khattak, Agriculture and education, Sweden



According to Jabar, providing the right information at the right time and in the right place is crucial in the fight against poverty and food insecurity. He also points to the need for (cold) storage facilities in order to reduce food waste due to excess produce in the agricultural sector.

Read the contribution <http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/comment/7600>











www.fao.org/fsnforum<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/>



CONTACT US<mailto:[log in to unmask]>  •  DISCLAIMER<http://www.fao.org/fsnforum/disclaimer-copyright>













########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the FSNFORUM-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FSNFORUM-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2