IMPACT-L Archives

Moderated conference on impact assessment of agricultural research: May 2014

Impact-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 15 May 2014 11:14:08 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
This is Dick Tinsley again.



I have noted considerable discussion on participatory methods in this conference. I would like to enter a level of caution on this as participatory procedures can easily be leveraged toward the bias of the research promoting an innovation. Too easy to ask leading questions, or receive appeasement replies. Thus these need to be complimented with some more solid observations or other measurements.  As much as I have always enjoyed my many informal discussions with smallholder producers in all the countries I have had the pleasure to work, I tend to be skeptical of reliance on participatory involvement, without some additional inputs.



Dr. Dick Tinsley

Soil and Crop Science Department, 

Colorado State University, 

Fort Collins, 

80523 USA

Richard.Tinsley (at) colostate.edu



[To contribute to this conference, send your message to [log in to unmask] For further information, see http://www.fao.org/nr/research-extension-systems/res-home/news/detail/en/c/217706/ ].



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the Impact-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=Impact-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2