IMPACT-L Archives

Moderated conference on impact assessment of agricultural research: May 2014

Impact-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 20 May 2014 10:21:49 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I am Sheilah S. Vergara, Program Specialist for Training and Capacity Building, Regional Center for Asia, International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), the Philippines. I was also the Program Manager of the Community Agricultural Technology Program (CATP) in the Philippines funded by the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). CATP was a project of ACIAR but was a program that had several agricultural projects focusing on adaption of select ACIAR technologies by farmer beneficiaries through the assistance of local NGOs. The program aimed to give farmers the opportunity to choose the technology that will suit them best. They were also provided with opportunities to conduct on-farm experiments using locally available materials. I have more than 10 years experience in program and project management and monitoring and evaluation of development projects.



I would like to share my experience on the following:



In CATP, the local NGOs which received grants from CATP to implement activities based on approved proposals instituted participatory monitoring and evaluation where the farmer-beneficiaries were the ones in charge of monitoring the results of new technologies adopted in the field. This was done with the guidance and assistance of the NGO field staff. The advantage of the involvement of farmers in monitoring the results of field experiments is that they get to adjust and develop their own strategies to attain increased production (crops or livestock). They are free to assess what basket of technology would best fit their needs and resources and each of the technologies offered are explained in detail so that the farmers have an informed choice.



Farmers know best what would work for them. And by involving them in the decision making process where they can select technologies that fit their needs, it is easier to involve them in monitoring and assessment of impacts given that they have a greater stake in the success of the project. Farmers who have been involved since the planning stage up to implementation and monitoring and evaluation are more likely to have a feeling of ownership for the project and more likely to continue implementing the project once funding is already terminated.



Sheilah S. Vergara

Program Specialist, Training and Capacity Building

Regional Center for Asia

International Institute of Rural Reconstruction

Y.C. James Yen Center,  Km. 39 Aguinaldo Highway,

Silang, Cavite 4118,

Philippines

Tel/Fax: +63 46 414 3216

Email: sheilah.vergara (at) iirr.org

Website: www.iirr.org



[To contribute to this conference, send your message to [log in to unmask] For further information, see http://www.fao.org/nr/research-extension-systems/res-home/news/detail/en/c/217706/ ].



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the Impact-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=Impact-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2