IMPACT-L Archives

Moderated conference on impact assessment of agricultural research: May 2014

Impact-L@LISTSERV.FAO.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 21 May 2014 11:54:46 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
This is Ekanath Khatiwada, again (previous message 2).



I fully agree with Mario R. Pareja (Message 58) on the logic of results based management (RBM) system, which is becoming one of the popular tools within the UN, World Bank groups and other development programmes on the ground. RBM system captures the results attributions beyond the technical aspects.



As a non technical person in this field, I enjoyed reading most of the posts. From the previous posts, it seems we are very advanced in the scientific result measurements in agriculture sectors and somehow I am missing the market point of view. Therefore, as a market development practitioner, I would equally suggest to capture the results of economic impact, increased market value of agriculture produce, increased jobs and income. Of course, we should not leave out the  “outreach” element .



Ekanath Khatiwada

Consultant -Market development

C/O: SNV, Zambia P.O Box 31771, 

7 Nkanchibaya Road

Lusaka 

Zambia 

Tel: +260 976800418 (Mobile)

e-mail: ekanath2003 (at) gmail.com



[To contribute to this conference, send your message to [log in to unmask] For further information, see http://www.fao.org/nr/research-extension-systems/res-home/news/detail/en/c/217706/ ].



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the Impact-L list, click the following link:

https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=Impact-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2