Dear Colleagues, Although mentioned once or twice in passing we haven't heard much about seromonitoring during the conference. As some participants know I am not greatly in favour of seromonitoring as a general follow-up to vaccination campaigns. It is expensive, the results usually arrive too late to be of use, and when they do arrive in time there are insufficient resources for a re-vaccination. I know it has an important role in disease investigation where vaccine failure is a possibility and is obviously needed for epidemiological studies but as a routine accompaniment to vaccination.....mmm? In rinderpest eradication we did a lot of sero-monitoring but I reckon that the most useful thing to come out of it was to train the laboratories to high levels of competence for the much more important sero-surveillance when vaccination ceased. Money saved on seromonitoring can be used for extra epidemiology such as disease search etc. Would anyone care to put me right on this? regards,- Moderator. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the FAO-AnimalHealth-L list, click the following link: https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FAO-AnimalHealth-L&A=1