Dear Joseph,

A lot has been said in this discussion.

Agriculture belonged to the local indigenous community way back before the
green revolution; the indigenous people were food/fruits gatherers. They
could throw the reminants in the surrounding where they live and because of
their observable skills on the seeds types  growing, they practiced what we
refer to as selection criteria based on; type, colour, Purity and
uniformity for over time resulting in to the diverse pure seeds varieties
of farmers in the farmers’ seed system. However the onset of the green
revolution due to the need to produce more food to the increasing
population coupled with limited land was a need to modify the farmers’
seeds in to the improved seeds we now see in the formal seed sector. Thus
farmers are knowledgeable of their own seeds in terms of adaptability,
suitability to the environment and the owners of agriculture through all
challenges they encountered in gardening and we need to consult them in all
aspects before programming.

                         unsuitable varieties have been provided as seed
aids, you find most of this varieties from the seed companies might have
stayed not planted over  time and have lost its viability hence the
agencies involve in seeds should impose strict technical guidelines on seed
variety and declares on seed quality imported for distribution by actors.

However sometimes the seeds may not be unsuitable but farmers lack
technology on the new variety especially timing of maturity indicators,
planting time,post harvest handling and even if the seeds are suitable the
farmers tend to blame the seed variety and yet there is need to introduce
and create technological information flow in prioritizing the use of this
new varieties through awareness of the new improve variety introduced to
farmers from seed aid and not neglecting the farmers basic seeds. I
experience this from one of the counties in south Sudan were the farmer
complained of groundnut variety (Serenut)supplied to her saying “the roots
started rotting when she was yet expecting the branches to yield more
roots” which was a sense of poor timing of maturity.

we can improve this if we carry out allot of consultative inquiry with
people on ground for seed producers hence we see what is appropriate and
feasible to obtain farmers views and incorporate in our rapid rural
appraisal approach (RRA) and also by having intense awareness of any
introduced variety to the farmers in terms of maturity timing, planting
period and all agronomic practices involve but not to rush on distribution
because projects have always a short duration.

                The seeds security in the disaster population is not always
intensively assessed, why? the agencies most times uses estimated figures
which may not be concrete to draw conclusions of which the ideas / findings
from the local people are underestimated and generalized hence they depend
on estimated data which may not be accurate.

                The views of the local people have never been taken in
consideration as the actors always surprises them with any seed type they
feel is cheaply available in the market and not considering varietal
choices, suitability, adaptability of the seed type and yet the local
people have the varieties which can further be modified. The local people
have to be considered in identifying their own problems and their views in
finding solutions to their own problems hence their ideas should be
considered in formal research.

Thanks

KOITI BETTY

Universal Network for Knowledge and Empowerment Agency (UNKEA).

FSL Manager


On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Horn of Africa Relief & Development
Agency(HARDA ) <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Joseph and other  Colleague,
>
> Thanks for this opportunity to share our ideas,
> bellow are my suggestion
>
> 1-Do you agree that at times unsuitable varieties are being provided in
> the form of seed aid? What is your experience with this? And do you think
> this can be improved?
>
> -Yes, I agree sometimes unsuitable varieties are been provided and low
> quality seeds, we have met this matter in 2012 Gu' season. we suggest that
> to initiate a program aimed at quality seed production by LNGOs in their
> respective areas and the experiment carried out in selected farms. The
> seeds produced in this initiative to be distributed freely to the farms of
> the area.
>
>
>
> 2.      Do you think seed security of the crisis/disaster-affected
> population is well assessed and analyzed before any intervention – If not
> how do you want this improved?
>
> -No,because mostly no seed assessment and analysis is conducted,I suggest
> farmers participation of assessment is very important before any
> intervention. the other problem is  that the seed contracting companies
> bring the seeds late. the problem is that seeds arrive and are distributed
> to the farmers late into the season.
>
>
>
> 3.      Are the views of the affected populations normally well taken into
> consideration when planning seed related interventions by humanitarian
> actors?
>
> . No, Seeds are brought by the humanitarian actors without taking into
> consideration the practical needs of the farmers. i.e the irrigation
> farmers along the juba river complained at one time a variety of Onion,
> water melon and other vegetable seeds  that were not suitable or low
> quality for our area.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Daahir Bashir Nor,
>
> HARDA Bardera,
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Okidi, Joseph (FAOKE)
>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:44 AM
>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>> *Subject:* Unsuitable crop parieties being provided to affected
>> population in the form of seed aid in the horn of Africa region
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> A lot of humanitarian and recovery work in food security in the Horn of
>> Africa region involves provision of seed aid with significant direct seed
>> distribution of seed sourced from the formal sector (seed companies). There
>> have been concerns from some of the assisted famers in the recent past that
>> some of the varieties are unsuitable (un-adapted and un-preferred). Many
>> times famer’s seed are considered of poor quality by humanitarian actors,
>> and therefore, the need to provide them with quality seeds of varieties
>> which are improved – high yielding, disease resistant, drought tolerant etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.      Do you agree that at times unsuitable varieties are being
>> provided in the form of seed aid? What is your experience with this? And do
>> you think this can be improved?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2.      Do you think seed security of the crisis/disaster affected
>> population is well assessed and analyzed before any intervention – If not
>> how do you want this improved?
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.      Are the views of the affected populations normally well taken
>> into consideration when planning seed related interventions by humanitarian
>> actors?
>>
>>
>>
>> Note: This e-discussion will run until 15th of August.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Joseph Okidi
>>
>>
>>
>> Seed System Specialist
>>
>> FAO REOA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the CoP-SeedSecurity-L list, click the following link:
>> https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=CoP-SeedSecurity-L&A=1
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Abdirahman A. Omar*
> *Executive Director, Somali programme*
> *HARDA Bardera Office (HQ)*
> *Cell: +254 718 740 291 Kenya*
> *        +252 61 8012 999 *
> *Email: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>,*
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the CoP-SeedSecurity-L list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=CoP-SeedSecurity-L&A=1
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CoP-SeedSecurity-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=CoP-SeedSecurity-L&A=1