Dear Gerardo and all,
Thanks for the useful table. Basically, I think that INSTCODE:ACCENUM are enough to 'identify' material among genebanks. If need be, to reconfirm the uniqueness of the material, GENUS might be added. This just in case that some genebank may have added the same ACCENUM to different accessions - but I doubt this is feasible.
Having these two fields will help to build on them with all the rest of 'optional' but valuable descriptors and can re-confirm the uniqueness of the PGRFA material.
Kind regards,
Adriana
-----Original Message-----
From: Global Information System on PGRFA [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Francione, Gerardo (AGDT)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:42 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Metadata fields
Dear colleagues,
I have compiled the attached table summarising the proposals received so far for your review.
Adriana, can you please check the mandatory/optional status of the fields you propose to add?
We thank you for contributing to the discussion and look forward to receiving more valuable comments on this important matter.
Thank you,
Regards,
Gerardo Francione
Treaty Secretariat
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1