On 06 Mar 2015, at 16:56, David Marshall <[log in to unmask]> wrote:I'm really in line with the others on this. This issues are not just based on a purely technical assessment score. The increased popularity and "Universality" of DOI's make them very attractive in particular if related user communities such as GBIF are using them in a comparable way. However again I would advocate that the biggest issue is the detailed definition of the scope of the identifiers and ideally the need to have very precise descriptions of how they are to be used. In particular the need to guard against using the identifiers in a way that tags similar but not identical entities. For example using the same identifiers for different cycles of a regenerated population or different curate versions of the same derived data set. In our experience "false joins " are more dangerous than failing to link entities and can really screwup semantic web approaches through a process of "Chinese whispers."
David
David Marshall
The James Hutton Institute
Invergowrie,
Dundee, Scotland, UK
Email: [log in to unmask]
Tele: +44(0)1382 568565
________________________________________
From: Global Information System on PGRFA [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Dag Endresen [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 06 March 2015 12:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Week 2 - Analysis of the PUID candidates against the requirements identified in W1
Dear all,
I have been on travel this week. I have now tried to fill in scores and comments in the table. I have left some options intentionally empty where I lack experience or information.
Best regards
Dag
________________________________________
From: Global Information System on PGRFA <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Lopez, Francisco (AGDT) <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: 03 March 2015 11:37
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Week 2 - Analysis of the PUID candidates against the requirements identified in W1
Dear colleagues,
we are now ready to open Week 2 of this electronic consultation on PUIDs for PGRFA. This week will be dedicated to analyze and compare the three candidate PUIDs that have been identified during the COGIS meeting (ARK, DOI and LSID) against the list of requirements that has ben discussed during last week.
For this purpose, we have prepared the attached the scoring table. For each requirement, we invite each one of you to fill-in the attached table assigning a score to each PUID candidate as follows:
1: requirement not supported or poorly supported, worst of the three
2: good support, middle tier
3: excellent support, best of the three
Duplicate scores are allowed in the same row. Optionally, you can add a brief comment about the scores you have assigned. During the week, we will compile all scores received and circulate a summary table. A final summary table with all scores and comments as well as a summary report will be circulated at the end of the week.
Thank you.
Regards,
Treaty Secretariat
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1
This email is from the James Hutton Institute, however the views expressed by the sender are not necessarily the views of the James Hutton Institute and its subsidiaries. This email and any attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or rely on any information contained in this email, and we would ask you to contact the sender immediately and delete the email from your system. Although the James Hutton Institute has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, neither the Institute nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses, and it is your responsibility to scan the email and any attachments.
The James Hutton Institute is a Scottish charitable company limited by guarantee.
Registered in Scotland No. SC374831
Registered Office: The James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie Dundee DD2 5DA.
Charity No. SC041796
To unsubscribe from the GLIS-PGRFA-L list, click the following link:
https://listserv.fao.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=GLIS-PGRFA-L&A=1