|
|
|
Rural women: striving for gender transformative impacts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Colleagues,
The online discussion
Rural women: striving for gender transformative impacts is coming to a close. We have been happy to receive many new comments
over the last days, please find them summarized below.
We also share with you the closing message from Clare Bishop, the facilitator of the discussion. Together with Clare we
would like to thank you for your active participation, which has made this a very fruitful exchange.
The discussion outcomes will inform the Expert Group Meeting on rural women organized by UN Women in September this year.
The report of this Meeting will then serve as one of the key background documents for the 62nd Commission on the Status of Women.
For those who still wish to send comments, we are happy to accept late contributions until Friday 11 August. Please post
them online or send them to [log in to unmask].
You can find a full overview of the discussion on the
FSN Forum website, where you can also download the
proceedings document.
We hope you have enjoyed this exchange!
The FSN Forum team
|
|
|
|
Clare Bishop,
facilitator of the discussion
|
Dear contributors and followers,
Thank you all for your contributions during the last three weeks which have resulted in a rich discussion.
There have been 66 individual contributors, representing over 30 countries and a mixture of organisations, multilateral
and bilateral agencies, NGOs, research institutes, colleges and universities. It has been encouraging to see so many men actively engaged in the discussion – accounting for 25% of the total contributors – because this is the path to gender transformative impacts.
A detailed review of the proceedings will be prepared over the coming weeks. The principal findings will be discussed at an Expert Group Meeting which will be held in Rome in September, as part of the preparatory activities for the Commission on the Status
of Women in March 2018.
Consequently, in this short piece, I have decided to focus on the inter-play between new opportunities and the constraints
imposed by social norms. One such example is male outmigration. The movement of men away from rural areas in search of employment, and many rural women becoming the primary farmer, could be seen as an opportunity to create space for women to become more involved
in economic activities and redefine their role in the agriculture sector. This may take place in the short-term, as women step in to fill the gap left by their male counterparts – partly out of necessity but partly taking advantage of the opportunity. They
get involved in new areas of business, engage with the market and broaden their networks and horizons. But in the longer term, their dreams and professional aspirations risk to be reined in by persistent social norms. Their new behaviour may be considered
to be unacceptable, colliding with the idea that a women’s place should be in the home, that they should not be making independent decisions, etc.
A major thread throughout this discussion has been the recognition of the need to address the root causes of gender inequalities
in order to achieve sustainable development. Behaviour change, based on a full understanding of the meaning of gender equality - of a just and equal world for all - is crucial. It has been exciting to read of so many different approaches being used to stimulate
gender transformative change at the individual, household and community levels. These will be explored in more detail in the follow-up actions.
Once again, thank you for your contributions. There is still time to post contributions or to send them to
[log in to unmask] by Friday 11 August; after that date, the discussion will be closed.
We look forward to sharing the synthesis report with you in due course.
Clare Bishop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED
|
|
Nitya
Rao, School of International Development and LANSA, India
|
|
Nitya stresses that we do not give adequate attention to the strategies women use to survive. She also discusses the
increase in the number of female-headed households in Africa and its implications.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Mahesh
Chander, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India
|
|
In his first contribution for this digest, Mahesh argues that movies can and should play a powerful role in women’s empowerment
and shares some resources on this issue.
Read
the contribution
In his second comment, Mahesh underlines the importance of recognizing women as farmers and not just agricultural labourers,
and of providing them with access to land.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Queen
Katembu, FAO, Kenya
|
|
Queen posts a case study of a project implemented by FAO in collaboration with ActionAid Kenya focusing on generating
GIS resource maps, and discusses the impact this project has had on the lives of rural women.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Dineshkumar
Singh, TATA Consultancy Services, India
|
|
Dineshkumar introduces the mKRISHI initiative which is concerned with digital innovation for rural people, and explains
how a participatory environment was created and women were engaged in the context of this project.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Brad
Wilson, United States of America
|
|
Brad shares an article he wrote on gender roles on farms in Iowa, USA, from the 1950s to today.
Read
the article
|
|
|
UNESCO
Institute for Lifelong Learning, Germany
|
|
The contribution from the UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning touches upon a variety of aspects, such as: 1) the diverse
contexts in which rural women find themselves; 2) entrepreneurship, sustainable livelihoods and the relevance of education for women's empowerment; 3) access to information and ICTs and empowerment, and 4) the question of how deeply rooted gender norms can
be changed.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Emily
Janoch, CARE, United States of America
|
|
Emily tells us about the experiences of CARE Ethiopia, which uses "Social Analysis and Action", a technique for engaging
men and strengthening women’s wellbeing in the community.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Szilvia
Lehel, Italy
|
|
In Szilvia’s view, the issue of climate change merits special attention, and she focuses on the gender-climate change-agriculture
nexus in responding to the three discussion questions.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Subhalakshmi
Nandi, UN Women, India
|
|
Subhalakshmi has concrete ideas on how approaches should be changed in order to achieve gender transformative impacts,
and expands on UN Women's work in India.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Anke
Stock, Women Engage for a Common Future, Germany
|
|
Anke responds to all the discussion questions, and stresses that adopting the 2030 Agenda would significantly impact
rural women’s empowerment.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Rwendeire
Peniel, Climate Smart Agriculture Network, Uganda
|
|
Rwendeire believes that using a household approach including men, women and children will promote gender transformative
impacts.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Tania
Sharmin, CARE, Bangladesh
|
|
Tania highlights that in order to address rural women's challenges, transforming gender norms and engaging men to change
the way women can act in the household and community is key. She illustrates her point by using practical examples.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Jipara
Turmamatova, UN Women, Kyrgyzstan
|
|
In her second contribution to the discussion, Jipara shares further insights from Rural Women’s Economic Empowerment
in Kyrgyzstan, a joint programme implemented by UN Women, FAO, IFAD and WFP aiming to address the multiple challenges faced by rural women in an integrated manner.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Alok
Shrestha, HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation Nepal, Nepal
|
|
Alok describes two initiatives implemented in a remote mountainous region of Nepal. One initiative concerns the Nutrition
in Mountain Agro-Ecosystems project, which also comprised a "school nutrition garden" which has been rather effective in behavior change towards agriculture and nutrition, especially among women.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Taibat
Moji Yusuf, Kwara State University, Nigeria
|
|
Taibat elaborates on the situation of rural women in Nigeria and focuses on concrete opportunities for (improving) initiatives
on various administrative levels.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Muthoni
Nguthi, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network (CSAYN), Kenya
|
|
Muthoni provides a contribution from the Kenyan Chapter of CSAYN. The submission addresses all the discussion questions,
describing the challenges of rural women and how they have and have not been addressed, and stressing the need for strategies that will directly target cultural norms and informal institutions.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Siyanbola
Omitoyin, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
|
|
Siyanbola points to the issues rural women in Nigeria are facing, which mainly include socio-cultural constraints.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Maria
Lee, WOCAN, France
|
|
Maria outlines the problems rural women are facing in Nepal. Furthermore, she argues that what is lacking is a robust
means of measuring outcomes of projects and policies to improve design and implementation, and points out that WOCAN has developed the "W+ Standard" to address these gaps.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
Samuel
Opoku Gyamfi, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network, Morocco
|
|
Samuel underlines the role of education in achieving gender equality, and thinks that modules on gender equality should
be integrated in the curricula from primary school on.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Leocadia
Muzah, GIZ, Zimbabwe
|
|
Leocadia discusses two strategies that have been used in trying to close the gender gap, focusing on women's empowerment
and gender and development; she provides arguments in favour of the latter.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Annelise
Thim, OECD, France
|
|
Annelise writes from the OECD Development Centre which is currently working on the update of the Social Institutions
and Gender Index, a cross-country measure of discriminatory social institutions that hold back women and girls from realising their rights.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Alejandra
Safa Barraza, Valentina Franchi and Nozomi Ide, FAO, Italy
|
|
Alejandra, Valentina and Nozomi underline the need to adopt an holistic approach, referring to FAO's guiding framework
"Developing gender-sensitive value chains" which proposes two categories of analysis: access to resources and power and agency.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Abdul-Aziz
Seidu Jawula, CSAYN Ghana, Ghana
|
|
According to Abdul-Aziz, a key problem is the neglect of rural communities by development actors. Challenges of rural
communities should be better understood and addressed by means of providing capacity building training to community-based organizations.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Anja
Rabezanahary, IFAD, Italy
|
|
Anja shares information on IFAD's Gender Action Learning System (GALS), which has been developed to tackle root causes
of inequalities and social exclusion with a focus on gender justice.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Farming
First, United Kingdom
|
|
Farming First provides the link to the infographic "the female face of farming".
Access the infographic
|
|
|
Taylor
Tondelli, FAO, Italy
|
|
Taylor stresses that in the forestry sector, one of women's biggest challenges is their limited access to and control
over land. He shares an example from the Foundation for Community Initiatives, which has adopted grass-roots approaches in aiming to transform customary practices.
Read the contribution
|
|
|
Kennedy
Phiri, Zambia
|
|
Kennedy highlights that marginalization and disempowerment of women often happen through narratives that people and communities
use, and that this issue deserves more attention.
Read
the contribution
|
|
|
|